Legal Opinion
In Re Raymour and Flanigan Fur.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided March 2, 2009No. A-4622-07T1PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
964 A.2d 830 (2009)
405 N.J. Super. 367
In the Matter of RAYMOUR AND FLANIGAN FURNITURE, and Neil Goldberg, President And Individually.
No. A-4622-07T1.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued January 6, 2009.
Decided March 2, 2009.
Paul DeCamp (Jackson Lewis) of the Virginia, D.C. and California bars, admitted pro hac vice, argued the cause for appellants, Raymour and Flanigan and Neil Goldberg (Jackson Lewis, attorneys; David G. Islinger, Mr. DeCamp and Justin B. Cutlip, on the brief).
Robert M. Strang, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent, New Jersey Department…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- DiProspero v. PennSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2005
- A. H. Phillips, Inc. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Merin v. MaglakiSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
- Demps v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- State v. CameronSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Sam Hargrove v. Sleepy's, LLC (072742)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2015
- Peters v. Early Healthcare Giver, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
- Thompson v. Real Estate Mortgage Network, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2015
- Branch v. DairyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2019
- Colon v. Strategic Delivery Solutions, LLCNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2019
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.