Legal Opinion

General Telephone Co. v. Rutland

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 9, 1969No. 44577PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Deen, Judge.

The plaintiff was injured while returning from a house to his automobile which was in front of the house on the south side of a street, when a telephone wire lying in the driveway and which was being strung by the defendant from a pole on the north side of the street to a house in the rear, and which line either lay in the street proper or sagged near its surface, was caught in the bumper of a passing automobile and whipped against the plaintiff’s legs, causing him to fall. The defendant appeals from the denial of its motion for summary judgment on the grounds that (1) any…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. City Council v. TharpeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  2. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. HowellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  3. Slappy v. Georgia Power CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bell South Telecommunications, Inc. v. WidnerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  2. Bell South Telecommunications, Inc. v. WidnerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API