Legal Opinion

Adkins v. Harrington

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 12, 1924PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

E. B. Kinsworthy, special Judge.

Street Improvement District No. 340 of the city of Little Rock, Arkansas, and the South Broadway annex thereto, were1 organized under the laws of the State of Arkansas regulating the organization of improvement districts in cities and towns, for the purpose of paving Broadway Street in the city of Little Rock, Arkansas, from Markham Street to Twenty-second Street.

Appellee, Eugene M. Harrington, is a property owner m and treasurer of said improvement district and annex.

Appellants, Homer M. Adkins and J. E. Engstroum, are the' duly qualified and acting sheriff…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sanderson v. TexarkanaSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
  2. Texarkana v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905
  3. Whaley v. Northern Road Improvement DistrictSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1922
  4. City of El Dorado v. Union CountySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1916
  5. Road Improvement District No. 1. v. McAlpinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1924

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Merchants' Transfer & Warehouse Co. v. GatesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929
  2. Citizens' Pipe Line Co. v. Twin City Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
  3. Moyer v. AltheimerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1925
  4. Ark. State Highway Comm. v. City of Little RockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1957
  5. County Bd. Elect. Comm. of Lonoke Cty. v. WaggonerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1935

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API