Legal Opinion
In Re the Complaint of ArAmark Sports & Entertainment Services, LLC
District Court, D. Utah
Decided July 20, 2010No. Case 2:08-CV-976 TSPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
IN ADMIRALTY
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER DENYING HOWETH CLAIMANTS’ MOTION TO DISSOLVE STAY OF PROCEEDING AND GRANTING ARAMARK’S MOTION FOR CIVIL CONTEMPT
TED STEWART, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This is an Admiralty case, arising out of an incident on Lake Powell wherein several persons — (the Howeth Group Claimants) renting Aramark’s 1 houseboat were allegedly sickened by carbon monoxide, allegedly resulting in one fatality and many injuries.
Pursuant to Admiralty law, this Court entered an Order Restraining Suits. The Howeth Group Claimants’ counsel nonetheless filed such a suit in…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. RylanderSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Beiswenger Enterprises Corp. v. CarlettaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
- Odeco Oil and Gas Co v. BonnetteCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
- Commodity Futures Trading Commission and the State of Florida v. Wellington Precious Metals, Inc., Daniel WeissCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1992
- John Zink Company v. ZinkCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Rust Rare CoinDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2021
- Utah Physicians for a Healthy Environment v. DIESELSellerz.comDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2024
- Utah Physicians for a Healthy Environment v. DIESELSellerz.comDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2025