Legal Opinion

People v. Trent

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 13, 1914No. Crim. No. 542PublishedCited by 2 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco and from an - order refusing a new trial. William P. Lawlor, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

This is an appeal from a judgment of conviction of the defendant of grand larceny and from an order denying a new trial. The appellant urges two points upon this appeal, both of which relate to the regularity of the court’s action in admitting in evidence the deposition of the prosecuting witness taken upon the preliminary examination and’ without the presence of which in evidence it is conceded the defendant could not have been convicted of the alleged crime.

The first contention of the appellant is that the court erred in admitting the deposition in evidence without having the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. BuckleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  2. People v. LedererCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
  3. People v. DeneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. HayesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  2. People v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API