Legal Opinion

Clarence Walker v. Thomas P. Roth

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided December 24, 1997No. 97-9127PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Per curiam

The district court dismissed Clarence Walker’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus, 28 U.S.C. § 2254, on the ground that it was a second or successive petition that could not be filed without prior authorization from this court. See, 28 U.S.C. § 2244. Mr. Walker therefore filed an application for leave to file a second or successive petition for habeas relief in this court. We dismiss the application as unnecessary, and instruct the district court to accept Walker’s petition.

In 1966, an Illinois jury convicted Walker of rape, armed robbery and attempted murder. The state court imposed an…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rafael Nunez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
  2. Ivan Batanic v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
  3. United States of America Ex Rel. Clarence Walker v. Michael O'leary, Warden, Stateville Correctional CenterCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Magwood v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  2. James J. Valona v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
  3. United States v. BarrettCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
  4. Kulvir Singh Barapind v. Janet Reno, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  5. Gregory L. Brown v. W. MunizCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API