Legal Opinion

Muschler v. General Metalsmiths, Inc.

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 18, 1925PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hagarty, J.:

Heretofore the defendant General Metalsmiths, Inc., moved to change the place of trial to Chautauqua county to suit the con'venience of witnesses, which motion was denied. Thereafter the plaintiff moved to examine the said defendant by certain of its officers at Jamestown in that county. Said defendant then served notice of the taking of the depositions, not only of these officers, but of several other employees and two experts at Jamestown, and the plaintiff now moves to vacate the notice. The provision of section 288 of the Civil Practice Act, as amended by chapter 926 of the…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Moore v. KeeseyWashington Supreme Court · 1946
  2. De Groote v. WegleinNew York Supreme Court · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API