Amcole Energy Corp. v. Chapman, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Per curiam
Appellee Chapman, Inc. has filed a motion to dismiss on the ground that the bond and the transcript were not timely filed. We do not agree and, therefore, we deny the motion to dismiss.
The record shows the following sequence:
*541July 19. Trial court signs default judgment against all four defendants.
July 26. Court grants motion for new trial filed by defendant Adams.
August 19. Appellants file motion for new trial.
September 26. Plaintiff files motion for nonsuit against defendant Adams, and court dismisses Adams from suit.
October 26. Appellants file appeal bond.
October 31. Transcript filed.
Appellee…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- H. B. Zachry Co. v. ThibodeauxTexas Supreme Court · 1963
- Runnymede Corporation v. METROPLEX PLAZA INC.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1976
- Stout-Jennings-Schmidt Co. v. SchmidtCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1981