Legal Opinion

Werneke v. Seabury

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 3, 1986No. 2-86-102-CVPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KELTNER, Justice.

The Wernekes appeal from a summary judgment granted in favor of one of the defendants in the trial court below. The summary judgment cancelled the notice of lis pendens filed by Werneke, as notice of their pending suit against appellees involving an allegedly fraudulent conveyance. The Wernekes’ point of error is not decided, as this court is without jurisdiction to hear this interlocutory appeal.

As a result, the appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

Werneke is a judgment creditor of Sea-bury Homes, Inc. Specifically, Mr. and Mrs. Werneke filed a previous…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kropp v. PratherCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975
  2. Hughes v. Houston Northwest Medical Center, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1982
  3. Lane v. FritzCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966
  4. Whatley v. KingTexas Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Pilot Engineering Co. v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Khraish v. Hamed, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1988
  2. Khraish v. Hamed, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1988
  3. Robert Marks v. Medford Starratt, Jr., Genesis Properties, L.P., Bright Star Homes, Inc., Brighton Enterprises, Ltd., Belvedere Enterprises, L.L.C., Dabo Investments, Inc., and Rab Equities, L.L.C., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API