Legal Opinion

Piazza v. Norwood

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided November 2, 1960PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMurphy, J.

The plaintiffs, wife and husband, sued to recover for personal injuries and property damage sustained when an automobile operated by the named defendant, allegedly as the authorized agent of his employer, the defendant Bridgeport Lincoln-Mercury, Inc., ran into the rear of the plaintiffs’ car. Both defendants appeared by their respective attorneys and filed answers to the complaint. When the case was reached for trial, the issues of liability and damages against the named defendant were withdrawn from the jury and were to be decided by the court. The named defendant was not present in court.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ezzo v. GeremiahSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
  2. Morse v. Consolidated Railway Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1908
  3. Raughtigan v. Norwich Nickel & Brass Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1912

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ianni v. DailySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
  2. State v. Anonymous (1971-2)Connecticut Appellate Court · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API