Legal Opinion

Dandy v. Glaze

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 16, 1962No. Appeal, 419PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Montgomery, J.,

In this workmen’s compensation case, claimant appeals from the order of the lower court dismissing his Exceptions to the Board’s seventh Finding of Fact and second Conclusion of Law to the effect that the accident in which claimant was involved did not occur in the course of his employment.

Claimant was employed as a helper on a trash truck. He customarily worked a six day week, Monday through Saturday, from 7:00 A.M. until 4:00 to 5:00 P.M. Employes were paid customarily by the employer on Saturday upon the completion of their work, at either the employer’s premises…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Curran v. Walter E. Knipe & Sons, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  2. Webb v. North Side Amusement Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  3. Dupree v. BarneySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  4. Irvin v. Plymouth Meeting Rubber Division Linear, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  5. Rodgers v. Methodist Episcopal HospitalSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hoffman v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  2. Maher v. Hallmark Cards, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  3. Everitt v. Baker Refrigerator Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  4. Urbasik v. JohnstownSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  5. Employers Mutual Casualty Co. v. Boiler Erection & Repair Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API