Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. Hemingway
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error from the district court for Lancaster county. Tried below before Cornish-, J.
1Opinion of the Court
Albert, C.
This action was brought, for the recovery of damages resulting from the alleged wrongful construction by the defendant company of an embankment across a ravine, whereby the. surface water was diverted from its natural course and discharged in large quantities upon the premises of the plaintiff, inflicting the damages complained of. A trial resulted in a verdict and judgment for the plaintiff. The defendant brings the case here on error.
The petition, omitting the formal parts, is as follows:
“(2.) That on and long prior to the 23d day of April, 1892, plaintiff was the owner in fee of…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Aldritt v. FleischauerNebraska Supreme Court · 1905
- Roe v. Howard CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1906
- Morse v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1908
- Waters v. Nebraska Mutual InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1922
- Cass County v. Sarpy CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1912
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.