Legal Opinion

Lichtenberger-Ferguson Co. v. Welch

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 18, 1931No. 6570PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JAMES, District Judge.

Appellant sued in the District Court to recover the sum of $33,235.31, which it alleged had been improperly assessed and collected as income taxes for the year 1919. The first items of the claim arose by reason of the refusal of the Revenue Department to allow the taxpayer to charge as expense for the year stated the amount of contract obligations for which it had issued its promissory notes. A separate item referred to an amount of $10,-011.63, which was received by appellant in February, 1920, and which the taxing officers assigned to income account for the year 1919,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Galatoire Bros. v. LinesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1928
  3. S. Naitove & Co. v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1929
  4. Lichtenberger-Ferguson Co. v. WelchDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1930

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. H. Liebes & Co. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1937
  2. University Properties, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
  3. San Joaquin Light & Power Corporation v. McLaughlinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1933
  4. Breeze Corporations, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1954
  5. National Labor Relations Board v. Swift & Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1947

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API