Legal Opinion

Wando Phosphate Co. v. Rosenberg

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided July 9, 1889PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Before Hudson, J., Darlington, January, 1889. This was an action by the Wando Phosphate Company against Joseph Rosenberg, commenced March 12, 1888. A warrant of attachment was issued by Judge Hudson pending suit, on December 12, 1888, upon the following affidavits : Personally appeared F. B. 'Hacker, who, being duly sworn, says, that he is president of the Wando Phosphate Company, plaintiffs in the above action.

Read the full summary

Before Hudson, J., Darlington, January, 1889. This was an action by the Wando Phosphate Company against Joseph Rosenberg, commenced March 12, 1888. A warrant of attachment was issued by Judge Hudson pending suit, on December 12, 1888, upon the following affidavits : Personally appeared F. B. 'Hacker, who, being duly sworn, says, that he is president of the Wando Phosphate Company, plaintiffs in the above action. That the plaintiffs have a cause of action against the defendant, Joseph Rosenberg, the particulars of which are fully stated in the verified complaint in said action, a copy of which…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court ivas delivered by

Mr. Chibe Justice Simpson.

An attachment was granted by his honor, Judge Hudson, in the action below upon certain affidavits submitted by the plaintiff, respondent. A motion was afterwards made by the defendant, appellant, to dissolve or dis*307charge said attachment, and affidavits were submitted both by respondent and appellant. This motion was refused by his honor, Judge Hudson, who heard the same. The defendant has appealed on the ground that the attachment was both irregularly and improvidently issued, and also upon the further ground that his honor…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Brewer v. GraydonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1958
  2. Gecy v. Somerset Point At Lady's Island Homeowners Ass'n, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2019
  3. McDaniel v. PattersonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1931
  4. Maiworm & Associates, Inc. v. Maiworm GmbH & Co.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1979
  5. Prince Manufacturing, Inc. v. Jus' Tennis, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API