Legal Opinion

BNO Leasing Corp. v. Mooty

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided February 7, 1983No. 5-411PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOUTALL, Judge.

This appeal arises from a judgment sustaining third party defendant’s exception of improper cumulation of actions. We reverse for the reasons which follow.

Appellant is Larry Mooty, the defendant in the principal demand. He has been sued by BNO Leasing Corporation for default under two lease agreements. Defendant-appellant Mooty made a third party demand against Byrne, Rice & Turner and Air Marine Radio, the two firms which were the suppliers of the allegedly defective leased equipment. Prior to trial Byrne, Rice & Turner filed an exception of no cause or right of action, which…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States v. AllenLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1969
  2. Bancshares Leasing Corp. v. CabralLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1981

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. BNO Leasing Corp. v. MootySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1983
  2. Adams v. First Financial Bank, FSBLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API