Legal Opinion

Ford v. Chemipulp Process, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided October 28, 1998No. CA 98-47Published

1Opinion of the Court

977 S.W.2d 5 (1998)

63 Ark.App. 260

Robert L. FORD, Sr., Appellant,

v.

CHEMIPULP PROCESS, INC., Appellee.

No. CA 98-47.

Court of Appeals of Arkansas, Divisions I and IV.

October 28, 1998.

Wm. Kirby Mouser, Pine Bluff, for Appellant.

William M. Griffin, III, Betty J. Demory, Little Rock, for Appellee.

MEADS, Judge.

Appellant, Robert Ford, appeals the decision of the Workers' Compensation Commission, which reversed the administrative law judge's award of benefits for an allegedly compensable work-related injury. The Commission found that the claimant failed to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Linthicum v. Mar-Bax Shirt Co.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1987
  2. McMillan v. U.S. MotorsCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1997
  3. Johnson v. HuxCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1989
  4. Stephens Truck Lines v. MillicanCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1997
  5. High Capacity Products v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1998

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API