Depaola v. Nat. Ins. Co., Humboldt Ins. Co.
Supreme Court of Rhode Island
Assumpsit. Heard on exceptions of defendant and overruled.
1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, C. J.
These are actions in assumpsit upon policies of insurance. The declarations are alike in each case, and to each declaration the defendants have respectively pleaded the general issue.
The allegations in the declarations are that the plaintiff was the owner of a stock of merchandise, store furniture, and fixtures, all contained at or in the frame two-story shingled roof building occupied for dwelling and store purposes, situate at seventy-eight and one-half Pierce Street, Westerly, R. I.; that the defendants in consideration of a premium of money, issued their policies of insurance, each in the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Farnum v. Phoenix InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Garrett v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- American Central Ins. v. McLanathanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1873
- State Insurance v. SchreckNebraska Supreme Court · 1889
- Breckinridge v. American Central InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1885
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Brown v. Church of the Holy Name of JesusSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1969
- Wagner v. National Fire Ins.Ohio Supreme Court · 1937
- Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance v. Piedmont Service Station, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1935
- Roberts v. HayesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1936
- Vezina v. BodreauSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1957
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.