Legal Opinion

Patterson v. Cronin

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided August 23, 1982No. 80SA80Published

1Opinion of the Court

650 P.2d 531 (1982)

Stephen PATTERSON, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

Dan CRONIN and the City and County of Denver, a municipal corporation, Defendants-Appellants.

No. 80SA80.

Supreme Court of Colorado, En Banc.

August 23, 1982.

Rehearing Denied September 7, 1982.

Frye & Sawaya, John R. Frye, Jr., Richard B. Rose, Denver, for plaintiff-appellee.

Max P. Zall, City Atty., Gerald Himelgrin, Asst. City Atty., Denver, for defendants-appellants.

ERICKSON, Justice.

The appellant, City and County of Denver (Denver), has appealed from a decision of the Denver District Court which held that service of a summons for a…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Rovira; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Rovira.

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  4. Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API