Howard Carr Companies, Inc. v. Cumberland Farms, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
20-1596 Howard Carr Companies, Inc. v. Cumberland Farms, Inc. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007, IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT=S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WITH THE NOTATION “SUMMARY ORDER”). A PARTY CITING TO A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY OF IT ON ANY…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Semtek International Inc. v. Lockheed Martin Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- In Re the Estate of HunterNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
- Edp Medical Computer Systems, Inc. v. United States of America, Docket No. 06-0106-CvCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- Strange v. Montefiore Hospital & Medical CenterNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Hodge v. Hotel Employees & Restaurant Employees Union Local 100 of the AFL-CIOAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.