Legal Opinion

Steans v. Combined Insurance Co. of America

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided August 4, 1998No. 97-6023, 97-6123PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ANDERSON, Circuit Judge:

In this case, the appellants Elizabeth Al-dridge and Doi'is Williams appeal the district court’s orders prohibiting future punitive damages awards in Alabama against Combined Insurance Company of America, and enjoining them from prosecuting their claims for punitive damages in state court. We conclude that the August 19, 1996, order prohibiting future punitive damages awards was not binding on Aldridge and Williams and that Aldridge and Williams did not have a full and fair opportunity to litigate the orders enjoining their state court claims for punitive damages. We…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Hansberry v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. HaslipSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Local Number 93, International Ass'n of Firefighters v. City of ClevelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Martin v. WilksSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. BEA Systems, Inc. v. WebMethods, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
  2. SWEPI, LP v. Mora CountyDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2015
  3. Barham v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 2013
  4. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Seahawk Deep Ocean Technology, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 1999
  5. The Original Brooklyn Water Bagel Co., Inc. v. Bersin Bagel Group, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2016

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API