Legal Opinion

State v. Philpott

Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee

Decided March 23, 1994PublishedCited by 99 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION WHITE, Judge.

The appellant, Manuel Philpott, appeals as of right from a judgment entered on November 9, 1992, in which he was sentenced to eight years for two counts of armed robbery.

On appeal, appellant raises a number of issues. 1 In addition to challenging the sufficiency of the evidence, appellant argues that the use of impermissibly suggestive identification procedures, the state’s failure to disclose an exculpatory statement, the improper impeachment of a crucial defense witness, the admission of two tape-recorded statements of an unavailable witness, and the prosecution’s…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by99 opinions

  1. State v. HallTennessee Supreme Court · 1998
  2. State v. BondsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2015
  3. State v. BowmanCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2009
  4. State v. HodgeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1998
  5. State v. JordanCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2003

94 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API