Dart v. State

OPINION

DAVIS, Commissioner.

Appeal is taken from a conviction for burglary. Punishment was assessed at twelve (12) years.

Appellant’s sole contention is that the court erred when it “denied a Statement of Facts for the purpose of appeal to the Appellant, Gary Dart. By denying a Statement of Facts to the Appellant, the trial court deprived the Appellant of the due process of law and the equal protection of the law to which he is entitled to under the United States and Texas Constitutions.”

Appellant is represented by retained counsel in the trial and on appeal. Appellant expressly denies that he…