Legal Opinion

Jones v. Patten

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 28, 1851PublishedCited by 20 opinions

ERROR to the Tippecanoe Court of Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the CourtPerkins, J.

Frederick Van Patten sued William Shultz in an action of assumpsit, on the following instrument:

“This article of agreement, made this 28th day of January, 1848, between Frederick Van Patten, of the first part, and William Shultz, of the second part, witnesseth, that said Frederick Van Patten binds himself to furnish a good sound flat-boat, with a pilot and six able bow-hands, for the purpose of boating corn down the Wabash, Ohio, and Mississippi rivers, to said William Shultz; and said Shultz shall pay to said Van Patten, for each and every bushel delivered at any point on said rivers,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Clark v. MarsigliaCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1845
  2. Life & Fire Insurance v. Mechanic Fire InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1831
  3. Shannon v. ComstockNew York Supreme Court · 1839
  4. Skinner v. DaytonNew York Supreme Court · 1822

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Cluck v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
  2. Houston & Texas Central Railway Co. v. MitchellTexas Supreme Court · 1873
  3. Purdy v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Polsley & Son v. AndersonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1874
  5. McClaren v. Indianapolis & Vincennes RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1882

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API