Legal Opinion

Beagles v. Miller-Stout

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 19, 2002No. 01-36123; D.C. No. CV-01-00020-FVSPublished

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Ronald Beagles, a Washington state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging denial of access to the courts, retaliation, denial of equal protection, and that his transfer violated Fed. R.App. P. 23(a). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo dismissals for failure to state a claim under the Prison Litigation Reform Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. Resnick v. Hayes, 213 F.3d 443, 447 (9th Cir.2000). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Beagles’s claim that he was denied access to the law library…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lewis v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Herman Resnick v. Warden Hayes Lt. Ernst Officer Myers (Dho) Counselor Aune Officer WadeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  3. Freeman v. ArpaioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  4. Rizzo v. DawsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  5. Shabazz v. CarrollCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API