Legal Opinion

Arrington v. Commonwealth

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided November 20, 1890PublishedCited by 33 opinions

Error to judgment of corporation court of the city of Alexandria, rendered September 18th, 1890, on an indictment against the plaintiff in error, Mary Arrington, for selling liquor without a license. Opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

Lewis, P.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The plaintiff in error was indicted in the corporation court of the city of Alexandria for that, “ on a certain day, between the 13tb day of September, 1889, and the 12th day of September, 1890, in the said city, she did unlawfully sell wine, ardent spirits, and malt liquors, without having first obtained *97a license therefor required by law.” The indictment was drawn under the statute which provides that no person shall, within the limits of this State, sell or offer to sell, by sample, or representation, or otherwise, wine, ardent spirits, malt…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Morey v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
  2. United States v. HessSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  3. Savage v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1888
  4. Boyd v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1883
  5. State v. HornemanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1876

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Pine v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1917
  2. State v. Lytle.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  3. State v. ReiffWashington Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Epps v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1975
  5. State v. . HookerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API