Legal Opinion

Stubblefield v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided November 29, 1922No. 7158PublishedCited by 6 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

offense is theft, a misdemeanor; punishment fixed at confinement in the county jail for a period of thirty days.

The prosecution is founded upon an information, but no complaint is found. The complaint is essential; it is jurisdictional. The prosecution cannot proceed without it. Code of Crim. Proc., Art. 479; Diltz v. State, 56 Texas Crim. Rep. 127; Vernon’s Tex. Crim. Stat., Vol. 2, p. 236, note 3.

The judgment of conviction is reversed and the prosecution ordered dismissed.

Dismissed.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Diltz v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1909

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
  2. Papageorge v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1932
  3. Melton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1930
  4. Aguilar v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
  5. Ashley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1951

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API