Legal Opinion

Succession of Gresham

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided December 11, 1985No. CA-3537PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

WARD, Judge.

The executrix of this succession appeals the denial of an exception of no cause of action which she filed in opposition to a petition to annul the will. The appeal was granted despite the rule that such an interlocutory judgment is appealable only if irreparable injury will result. La.C.C.P. art. 2083; Rapides Central Railway Co. v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co., 207 La. 870, 22 So.2d 200 (1945). We dismiss the appeal.

Recognizing that irreparable harm must be shown, Appellant asserted in her petition for appeal, that “it will be impossible to administer the succession until there…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rapides Cent. Ry. Co. v. Missouri Pac. R. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1945
  2. H. G. Hill Stores Realty Co. v. LatterSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1955

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Succession of GreshamLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API