Legal Opinion

Odom v. Atlanta & West Point Railroad

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 21, 1949No. 32273PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFelton, J.

The rule in Bloodworth v. Jones, 191 Ga. 193 (11 S. E. 2d, 658), seems to control this case. It was there held that “the statute vests the right to sue in the first instance in the widow, and so long as she lives neither the children nor any one for them can institute such action.” This court can not legislate an exception into the plain words of the statute. See Code, § 105-1302. The same case holds that “the statute makes no provision for a case where the widow declines to sue,” and we submit that that ruling means where she declines to sue fraudulently or otherwise. Where the Supreme Court…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bloodworth v. JonesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
  2. Watson v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lawrence v. WhittleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
  2. Star Jewelers, Inc. v. DurhamCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
  3. Western & Atlantic Railroad v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API