Legal Opinion

State v. Wehrly

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 3, 1933No. 77PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKunkle, J.

From such judgment of the Court of Common Pleas dismissing the appeal and overruling the motion of plaintiff in error for leave ,to amend the appeal bond, error is prosecuted to this court.

Counsel have favored the court with briefs in which their respective views are set forth in detail.

There has also been filed with us the written opinion of Judge Risinger of the Court of Common Pleas in which he details the facts disclosed by the record not only in his court but also in the lower court. In view of this detailed opinion of Judge Risinger, we do not deem it necessary to re-state all the facts…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hale v. Sagamore HillsOhio Court of Appeals · 1934
  2. Sears v. BadgleyOhio Court of Appeals · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API