Strong v. City Nat. Bk. of Phila.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Horace Stern,
This appeal is an aftermath of Bacher, Administratrix, v. City national Bank of Philadelphia, 347 Pa. 80, 31 A.2d 725.
Briefly to rehearse the facts in the case — one Clara Bacher was the administratrix of the Estate of Anna Hoffman, deceased, in which capacity she employed Wil-. liam J. Bailen, a member of the bar, as her lawyer. She executed a written power of attorney authorizing and directing him “to collect any and all moneys due the said estate, and to endorse any and all checks payable to me as administratrix of the said estate, and to deposit the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Bacher v. City Nat. Bk., Phila.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
- Indiana Flooring Co. v. District Nat. Bank of WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1922
- Relf v. Bank of MobileSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1853
3Cited by11 opinions
- Salsman v. National Community Bank of RutherfordNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968
- Leeds v. Chase Manhattan BankNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2000
- Jones v. Van NormanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Levy v. First Pennsylvania Bank N.A.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Southern Agency Co. v. Hampton Bank of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1970
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.