Stewart v. Paulding
Supreme Court of Louisiana
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT. This is an áction by the vendor of an auction sale, to recover of the defendant two thousand and twenty dollars, the difference in price and commissions on the re-sale, between the first and second adjudications, in consequence of the bidder failing to comply with the first.
Read the full summary
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT. This is an áction by the vendor of an auction sale, to recover of the defendant two thousand and twenty dollars, the difference in price and commissions on the re-sale, between the first and second adjudications, in consequence of the bidder failing to comply with the first. The defendant pleaded a general denial, and averred that the plaintiff could not make him a good title to the property bid off by him, within ten days after the adjudication, in consequence of, which the sale became null and void; that after the property was put up and…
1Opinion of the CourtMartin, J.
The defendant is appellant from a judgment, which condemns him to pay the difference between the price, at which certain property was adjudicated to him at the first sale, and that for which it was adjudicated on a re-sale at public auction, on his refusal to comply with the terms and conditions of the first adjudication.
Where the bidperty T^adjudition^ale^feiis'to eompiy with the terms and conditions of the ad-seller may afthe end of ten days after the customary advertise-Se'properfyl.y advertismg it aecording to law, ten days, and the for the deficiency the firstbandesecond sales. ' vendor…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Stockelback v. BradleySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1925
- Duncan v. ArmantSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1848
- McLellan v. RosserLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1905
- Spellman v. BradleySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1927
- Stockelback v. BradleySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1925