Legal Opinion

City of East Cleveland v. Gilbert

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided October 21, 1970No. 69-741PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHofstetter, J.

The primary question raised by the appellant is the applicability, if any, of R. C. 2937.21 to the granting of continuances in the trial of a misdemeanor in a Municipal Court, a court of record, after a plea of not guilty has been entered and the ease has been set for hearing, and whether, under such circumstances, the municipality or state is limited to a flat ten-day continuance.

Clearly, R. C. 2937.21 is not applicable to the case at bar! R. C. 2937.08 provides that R. C. Chapter 2938 is applicable where, on arraignment under R. C. Chapter 2937, the accused pleads not guilty to the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re TherklidsenOhio Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. City of Columbus v. VestOhio Court of Appeals · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API