Ark. Game & Fish Comm'n & Jeff Crow v. Heslep

c. Allow Plaintiffs or others who rely on this access to perform maintenance and repair without damaging AGFC lands;

d. Declare AGFC's actions in this case of blocking access and making unreasonable demands to Plaintiffs as violating its authority under Amendment 35;

e. Declare the Land Use Permit Agreement unnecessary and outside the scope of AGFC's powers in Amendment 35 because it contains provisions that are unnecessary, unconscionable and against public policy;

f. Find AGFC's actions constitute a temporary or complete taking without due ... process and without compensation; and

g. For all…