Legal Opinion

Doe v. Rausch

District Court, M.D. Tennessee

Decided February 16, 2022No. 3:20-cv-00728Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION JOHN DOE, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) NO. 3:20-cv-00728 v. ) ) JUDGE CAMPBELL DAVID B. RAUSCH, Director of the ) MAGISTRATE JUDGE Tennessee Bureau of Investigation, in his ) FRENSLEY official capacity, ) ) Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM Pending before the Court is Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 14). Plaintiff filed a Response in Opposition (Doc. No. 17) and Defendant filed a Reply (Doc. No. 18). For the reasons discussed below, Defendant’s Motion will be GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. I. FACTUAL AND…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Jones v. BockSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Washington State Grange v. Washington State Republican PartySupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  5. Eidson v. Tennessee Department of Children's ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API