Asure v. Hankele
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 279, Oct. T., 1918, by plaintiff, from judgment of C. P. Bucks Co., December T., 1917, No. 33, sur demurrer to amended declaration in the case of William Asure, Mary F. Muir, Wilmer E. Scarborough, Fred Humphrey and Alfred H. Muir v. Allen J. Hankele, Landlord, and Albert R. Atkinson, Constable. Replevin to recover personal property levied on under landlord’s warrant.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 279, Oct. T., 1918, by plaintiff, from judgment of C. P. Bucks Co., December T., 1917, No. 33, sur demurrer to amended declaration in the case of William Asure, Mary F. Muir, Wilmer E. Scarborough, Fred Humphrey and Alfred H. Muir v. Allen J. Hankele, Landlord, and Albert R. Atkinson, Constable. Replevin to recover personal property levied on under landlord’s warrant. Before Ryan, P. J. The plaintiffs’ declaration set forth that they were the owners of certain personal property levied on in landlord’s warrant against Alfred H. Muir, and that the tenant was not indebted to the…
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
The questions raised on this appeal are adequately disposed of in the opinion filed in the court below sustaining the demurrer.
In addition to the authorities therein cited may be added, Weed v. Hall, 101 Pa. 595; Drumgoole v. Lyle, 30 Pa. Superior Ct. 463; Hollander Drug Co. v. American Surety Co., 47 Pa. Superior Ct. 403; Strong, Deemer & Co. v. Dinniny, 175 Pa. 586.
The judgment is affirmed.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Drumgoole v. LyleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
- Strong, Deemer & Co. v. DinninySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
- Hollander Brothers Drug Co v. American Surety Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1911