Legal Opinion

Hamner v. Starling

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 23, 1932No. 4-2564PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoHaney, J.

This is a suit for specific performance brought by appellees against appellant to compel him to convey to them as the widow and heirs at law of J. W. Starling, deceased, 360 acres of land contracted to be conveyed by appellant to said Starling on or about December 15, 1924, by oral agreement. The complaint alleged the sale and purchase of the land for a consideration of $12,800, of which $800 was paid in cash, and that the remainder was to be paid from the proceeds of one-fourth of all the cotton grown on the lands until the purchase price with interest should be paid. It was alleged that…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Temple v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
  2. Johnson v. HullSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1893
  3. Greer v. TurnerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1880
  4. Missouri Pacific Railroad v. FrostSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1920
  5. Matlock v. PurefoySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1857

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Loveless v. DiehlSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1963
  2. Loveless v. DiehlSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1963
  3. Tisdale v. AkersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API