Crowell v. City of Eastman
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Benham, Judge.
The dispositive rule of law in these appeals is the “law of the case” rule. In Crowell v. City of Eastman, 182 Ga. App. 489 (356 SE2d 104) (1987), holding that this was not a proper case for declaratory judgment, this court reversed the judgment entered in favor of appellees. Upon the return of the remittitur, appellees filed a motion for summary judgment. The main appeal here is from the grant of that motion. The cross-appeal concerns a holding the trial court made in the course of granting summary judgment to appellees.
1. This case may instructively be compared to Worley v.…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Stafford Enterprises, Inc. v. American Cyanamid Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
- Shepherd v. ShepherdSupreme Court of Georgia · 1979
- Worley v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
- Crowell v. City of EastmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
3Cited by4 opinions
- Kent v. AO WHITECourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
- PALM RESTAURANT OF GEORGIA, INC. v. PrakasCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
- International Indemnity Co. v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
- Kent v. WHITE, CONSULTING ENGINEERS, PCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001