Legal Opinion

Bendix-Westinghouse Automotive Air Brake Co. v. Swan Rubber Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 17, 1976No. Civ. 15012PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PARAS, J.

As aresult of injuries "sustained by plaintiffs when their automobile collided with a truck, plaintiffs filed suit against the truck driver and his employer, Trails Trucking Company, claiming negligence. On January 30, 1968, plaintiffs amended their complaint by adding San Jose Autocar White Company (hereinafter “Autocar”) as a third defendant. Autocar was sued on breach of warranty and products liability theories for allegedly installing a faulty air brake hose on the truck.

On Februaiy 5, 1968, Autocar filed a cross-complaint against Bendix-Westinghouse Automotive Air Brake…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sampson v. OhleyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863
  2. Pezel v. YerexCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
  3. Liberty Mutual Insurance v. ByerlyDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1969

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Webb v. Dessert Seed Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1986
  2. Begley v. Jeep Corp.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 1980
  3. Foremost-McKesson Corp. v. Allied Chemical Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API