Legal Opinion

Hoppe v. Slovik

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided February 16, 1996No. 2941126Published

1Opinion of the Court

MONROE, Judge.

Bill Hoppe appeals from the summary judgment entered in favor of William Slovik, who does business as B & B Motors. The case arises from a dispute over possession of a van. Hoppe left his van with Slovik for repairs. Once the van was repaired, Slovik sent Hoppe a bill. The evidence is conflicting as to whether Hoppe simply failed to pick up the van or whether he and Slovik had a disagreement concerning the workmanship and cost of the repairs. Slovik took action under the “abandoned motor vehicle” statute, § 32-13-1 et seq., Ala.Code 1975, and notified Hoppe that he was going to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Vining v. ViningCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API