Legal Opinion
People v. Chander
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 15, 2014PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*698Based on the record before this Court, we reject the defendant’s contention that the Supreme Court did not have jurisdiction over this criminal action (see generally CPL 100.05, 180.10 [1], [2]; 190.50).
The defendant also argues that his plea was not knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently entered because the Supreme Court failed to adequately advise him that he would not be permitted to withdraw his plea if he violated a condition of the plea agreement. Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the record, taken as a whole, indicates that the defendant was informed that he would be subjected…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People v. CatuNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
- People v. LoureeNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
- People v. McAlpinNew York Court of Appeals · 2011
- People v. GibbsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- People v. AkhtarAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- People v. DuryeaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- People v. StanleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
- People v. CorbettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- People v. DuryeaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014