Eidemiller Ice Co. v. Guthrie
Nebraska Supreme Court
Appeal from the district court of Nuckolls county. Heard below before Hastings, J. The facts appear in the opinion. Injunction will not be granted unless the applicant has a clear and well-established right to the remedy. (Snowden v. Noah, 14 Am. Dec. [N. Y.], 547; Hinchman v. Patterson Horse R. Co., 86 Am. Dec. [N. J.], 252; Rhodes v. Dunbar, 98 Am. Dec. [Pa.], 221; Roath v. Driscoll, 52 Am. Dec. [Conn.], 352; Sheldon v. Rockwell, 76 Am.
Read the full summary
Appeal from the district court of Nuckolls county. Heard below before Hastings, J. The facts appear in the opinion. Injunction will not be granted unless the applicant has a clear and well-established right to the remedy. (Snowden v. Noah, 14 Am. Dec. [N. Y.], 547; Hinchman v. Patterson Horse R. Co., 86 Am. Dec. [N. J.], 252; Rhodes v. Dunbar, 98 Am. Dec. [Pa.], 221; Roath v. Driscoll, 52 Am. Dec. [Conn.], 352; Sheldon v. Rockwell, 76 Am. Dec. [Wis.], 265; 7 Lawson, Rights, Remedies & Practice, p. 5769.) The remedy of injunction will not be granted where the plaintiff has an adequate remedy…
1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.
March 9, 1891, the appellee herein, the Eidemiller Ice Company (hereinafter referred to as the “company”), instituted an action against Robert and David Guthrie, partners under the firm name and style of Guthrie Bros., and in order that a full understanding of the issues may be had, we think it best to copy the petition and answer. The original petition was demurred to and an amended one filed, which was as follows:
“Comes now the Eidemiller Ice Company, a corporation duly incorporated and doing business as such, and complaining of Robert Guthrie and David Guthrie, partners doing business…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Lorman v. BensonMichigan Supreme Court · 1860
- Paine v. WoodsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
- Brookville & Metamora Hydraulic Co. v. ButlerIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
- Washington Ice Co. v. ShortallIllinois Supreme Court · 1881
- Bigelow v. ShawMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- People v. HulbertMichigan Supreme Court · 1902
- Greisinger v. KlinhardtSupreme Court of Missouri · 1928
- Rath v. City of SuttonNebraska Supreme Court · 2004
- Clark v. Cambridge & Arapahoe Irrigation & Improvement Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1895
- Taft v. Bridgeton Worsted Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.