Legal Opinion

Fitzsimmons v. United States Fire Insurance

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 2, 1959PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFrederic T. Henry, J.

This motion involves the question of whether the insurer, under its covenant to defend actions brought against the insured in a comprehensive personal liability policy must defend claims brought for workmen’s compensation benefits. The defendant issued to the plaintiff a policy of comprehensive personal liability insurance, the pertinent portions of which are as follows:

The company agrees with the insured * * * subject to the limits of liability, exclusions, conditions and other terms of this policy:

‘ ‘ I. Coverage A-Liability. To pay on behalf of the insured all sums which the insured shall…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Lee v. Aetna Casualty & Surety CoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
  2. Goldberg v. Lumber Mutual Casualty InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1948
  3. Grand Union Co. v. General Accident, Fire & Life Assurance Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
  4. Grand Union Co. v. General Accident, Fire & Life Assurance Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1938
  5. Mason-Henry Press v. . &198tna L. Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1914

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. William J. Templeman Co. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 2000
  2. Brooklyn & Queens Allied Oil Burner Service Co. v. Security Mutual InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Cohen v. JacobyNew York Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Kentucky Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. v. CannCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1979
  5. Neville v. Continental Casualty Co.New York Supreme Court · 1966

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API