Legal Opinion
Ferrigno v. Pep Boys
Connecticut Superior Court
Decided January 23, 2003No. File No. CV02-0463867SPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBlue, J.
The motion to strike now before the court attacks the allegations of breach of contract and violation of the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act (CUTPA), General Statutes § 42-110a et seq., contained in the plaintiffs complaint. For reasons briefly stated below, the motion fails with respect to the breach of contract claim but succeeds with respect to the CUTPA claim.
The plaintiff, Angelo Ferrigno, alleges that on June 17, 2001, he entered into a contract with the defendant, Pep Boys — Manny, Moe & Jack of Delaware, Inc. (Pep Boys). Ferrigno purchased two tires for his Jeep Cherokee for…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Waterman Steamship Corp. v. Dugan & McNamara, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Haynes v. Yale-New Haven HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Suffield Development Associates Ltd. Partnership v. National Loan Investors, L.P.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Janusauskas v. FichmanConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
3Cited by3 opinions
- Federal Insurance Company a/s/o Robert and Joanie Emerson v. Martin Edward Winters, d/b/a Winters Roofing CompanyTennessee Supreme Court · 2011
- Freedman v. America Online, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2004
- Schachter v. Sunrise Senior Living Management IncDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2020