Legal Opinion
In Re Perrone
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided June 20, 2006No. 959 Disciplinary Docket 2Published
1Opinion of the Court
899 A.2d 1108 (2006)
In the Matter of William James PERRONE.
No. 959 Disciplinary Docket No. 2.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Argued October 19, 2005.
Decided June 20, 2006.
Harold E. Ciampoli, Jr., Esq., for Office of Disciplinary Counsel.
Samuel C. Stretton, Esq., West Chester, for William J. Perrone.
BEFORE: CAPPY, C.J., and CASTILLE, NIGRO, NEWMAN, SAYLOR, EAKIN, and BAER, JJ.
OPINION
Chief Justice CAPPY.
This matter involves William James Perrone's second petition for reinstatement following his disbarment from the practice of law in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania on November 30, 1995,…
Also in this document: Concurrence; Dissent.
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. KellerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Hammermill Paper Co. v. Rust Engineering Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
- Universal Am-Can, Ltd. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. KiesewetterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Feller v. New Amsterdam Cas. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.