Legal Opinion

Ryman v. Sears, Roebuck and Company

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 12, 2007No. 06-35630Published

1Opinion of the Court

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DANIEL RYMAN,  No. 06-35630 Plaintiff-Appellant, v.  D.C. No. CV-05-01106-BR SEARS, ROEBUCK AND COMPANY, OPINION Defendant-Appellee.  Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Anna J. Brown, District Judge, Presiding Submitted September 25, 2007* Portland, Oregon Filed October 12, 2007 Before: Ferdinand F. Fernandez, Barry G. Silverman, and Susan P. Graber, Circuit Judges. Opinion by Judge Silverman *The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Vestar Development Ii, Llc, an Arizona Limited Liability v. General Dynamics Corporation, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  2. Swirsky v. CareyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  3. Yeager v. Providence Health System OregonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  4. Yeager v. PROVIDENCE HEALTH SYSTEM OREGONOregon Supreme Court · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API