Legal Opinion

In re the Arbitration between Jolson & Forest Laboratories Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 20, 1962PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*902The award is not sufficiently clear. Instead, it provides obvious areas for disagreement between the parties, with especial difficulty upon the accounting which has been directed. The award in directing the accounting itself related its scope generally to the agreement. At the same time it did not specify the particular terms of the agreement upon which the computation was to be based. In providing for a 25% commission “in all sales in the covered territory mentioned in Paragraph 7d ” of the agreement between the parties, the award fails to specify upon what base the percentage should be…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Paperhandlers Union No. 1 v. U.S. Trucking Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1977
  2. Hamilton Partners Ltd. v. SingerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  3. Caso v. CoffeyNew York Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Corning Firefighters, Local 932 v. City of CorningAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API