Legal Opinion
State v. Cunningham
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided April 11, 2008No. 2006-024Published
1Opinion of the Court
954 A.2d 1290 (2008)
2008 VT 43
STATE of Vermont
v.
John A. CUNNINGHAM.
No. 06-024.
Supreme Court of Vermont.
April 11, 2008.
William H. Sorrell, Attorney General, and Craig Matanle, Assistant Attorney General, Montpelier, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Matthew F. Valerio, Defender General, Anna Saxman, Deputy Defender General, and Jon Dodson, Law Clerk (on the Brief), Montpelier, for Defendant-Appellant.
Present: REIBER, C.J., DOOLEY, JOHNSON, SKOGLUND and BURGESS. JJ.
REIBER, C.J.
¶ 1. Defendant John Cunningham appeals from a district court order denying his motion to suppress certain evidence obtained after…
Also in this document: Concurrence; Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Pennsylvania v. MimmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Alabama v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.