Krieg v. Bofferding
Supreme Court of Minnesota
'•> Action in the district court for Hennepin county. The case was tried before Steele, J., and a jury which returned a verdict for 'plaintiff. From an order denying their motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial defendants Clem Bofferding and R. O. Haegele appealed.
1Per curiam
Plaintiff had a verdict in this action, and a stay of proceedings was ordered *513to enable defendants to settle a case and move for a new trial. Tbe stay expired and defendants were in default; no case was settled or motion for a new trial made. Judgment was then entered on the verdict in favor of the plaintiff. Thereafter, at the instance and request of defendant Bofferding, plaintiff consented to a renewal and extension of the stay of proceedings, to the end that defendants might have further time within which to settle a ease and move for a new trial. In consideration of such consent it was…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- State v. SawyerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
3Cited by4 opinions
- Spratt v. SprattSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
- Minnesota Vikings Football Club, Inc. v. Metropolitan CouncilSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Amplatz v. AmplatzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- MINN. VIKINGS FOOTBALL CLUB v. Metro. CouncilSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979