Legal Opinion

State v. Bound

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided January 16, 1975No. 33814PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCoerigaN, J.

The State of OMo appeals the trial court’s finding that defendant’s constitutional rights to a speedy trial have been violated. As a result of undercover work by its agents the West Shore Enforcement Bureau had information indicating that on January 9,1972 defendant was guilty of possession for sale and sale of heroin. Nine months later, on October 5, 1972, defendant was secretly indicted and a capias for his arrest was immediately issued. It was not until December 21, 1973, fourteen months later, that defendant was arrested. He was subsequently permitted to withdraw a previously entered plea…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Moore v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. WellsOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. State v. GettysOhio Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. State v. NelsonOhio Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. State v. BranchOhio Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. State v. McAllisterOhio Court of Appeals · 1977

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API