Legal Opinion

State v. Occhipinti

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided September 30, 1977PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Schiaffo, J. S. C.

Having been indicted for possession of 0.64 grams of cocaine, defendant makes application for supervisory treatment pursuant to N. J. S. A. 24:21-27. On a prior occasion defendant, without pleading to the pending charge, successfully applied for supervisory treatment, to the Paramus Municipal Court, which subsequently granted a conditional discharge pursuant to N. J. S. A. 24: 21-27.

The prosecutor argues that since defendant has on a prior occasion been afforded the relief of § 27, the court is without jurisdiction to entertain the pending application.

The defendant contends…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. GrayNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1986
  2. State v. GrayNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1987
  3. State v. MarzolfSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API